Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem

From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem
Date: 2001-10-04 17:36:26
Message-ID: 3BBC9E1A.6040606@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Thomas,

Can you explain more how this functionality has changed? I know that in
the JDBC driver fractional seconds are assumed to be two decimal places.
If this is no longer true, I need to understand the new symantics so
that the JDBC parsing routines can be changed. Other interfaces may
have similar issues.

thanks,
--Barry

Thomas Lockhart wrote:

>>Problem: the external representation of time and timestamp are
>> less precise than the internal representation.
>>
>
> Fixed (as of yesterday) in the upcoming release.
>
> - Thomas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurette Cisneros 2001-10-04 17:46:10 Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem
Previous Message Laurette Cisneros 2001-10-04 16:56:10 Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurette Cisneros 2001-10-04 17:46:10 Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem
Previous Message Laurette Cisneros 2001-10-04 16:56:10 Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem