| From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
| Date: | 2001-10-04 17:36:26 |
| Message-ID: | 3BBC9E1A.6040606@xythos.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Thomas,
Can you explain more how this functionality has changed? I know that in
the JDBC driver fractional seconds are assumed to be two decimal places.
If this is no longer true, I need to understand the new symantics so
that the JDBC parsing routines can be changed. Other interfaces may
have similar issues.
thanks,
--Barry
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>>Problem: the external representation of time and timestamp are
>> less precise than the internal representation.
>>
>
> Fixed (as of yesterday) in the upcoming release.
>
> - Thomas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurette Cisneros | 2001-10-04 17:46:10 | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
| Previous Message | Laurette Cisneros | 2001-10-04 16:56:10 | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurette Cisneros | 2001-10-04 17:46:10 | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
| Previous Message | Laurette Cisneros | 2001-10-04 16:56:10 | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |