From: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hunter Hillegas <lists(at)lastonepicked(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Do I just not understand count()? |
Date: | 2002-04-08 18:39:41 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204081137340.9115-100000@gilgamesh.eos.SilentMedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Er, uh, well, because I confused myself with my trivial example. :)
What I should have said was: it's giving me 3 (not 2), and I'm expecting 2
(not 1).
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
> Why would you think it would return 1? the number of rows where a=1 in t is
> 2...
>
>
> > From: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
> > Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 11:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
> > To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> > Subject: [GENERAL] Do I just not understand count()?
> >
> > If I have the table t defined as:
> >
> > a
> > ---
> > 1
> > 1
> > 2
> >
> >
> > and I say:
> >
> > select count(a=1) from t;
> >
> > should it give me 1 or 2 as a result? I'm getting 2, and I'd think I
> > should get 1....
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Wood | 2002-04-08 18:42:01 | Re: Do I just not understand count()? |
Previous Message | Ben | 2002-04-08 18:25:43 | Do I just not understand count()? |