From: | "Gregory Wood" <gregw(at)com-stock(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Ben" <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Do I just not understand count()? |
Date: | 2002-04-08 18:42:01 |
Message-ID: | 003f01c1df2d$12a8f6b0$7889ffcc@comstock.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I don't think I've seen that particular syntax used before (I would say
select count(a) from t where a=1;), but since the query appears to work, I
won't argue.
Why do you think it should give you a result of 1? There are two rows
containing a value of 1 for a, hence it returns 2.
Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben" <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:25 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Do I just not understand count()?
> If I have the table t defined as:
>
> a
> ---
> 1
> 1
> 2
>
>
> and I say:
>
> select count(a=1) from t;
>
> should it give me 1 or 2 as a result? I'm getting 2, and I'd think I
> should get 1....
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeffrey W. Baker | 2002-04-08 18:45:01 | Re: vacuuming not working? |
Previous Message | Ben | 2002-04-08 18:39:41 | Re: Do I just not understand count()? |