| From: | "Command Prompt, Inc(dot)" <pgsql-general(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Muir <wsmuir(at)islandnet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuuming - how often? |
| Date: | 2001-11-14 07:30:39 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111132329440.3656-100000@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
An active database, should be vacummed nightly. It will keep things in tip
top shape and help maintain the database overall.
J
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Scott Muir wrote:
> I'm using 7.1 on redhat 7.1...
>
> I had a query result which startled me a bit... it was a simple join and
> the result was like a cartesian product like I hadn't bothered with a when
> clause.
>
> I ran vacuum from inside pgaccess and the results of the query changed to
> what I was expecting in the first place...
>
> What I'm wondering is what is the likely problem here? Does this mean that
> *regular* maintenance is required? the data in this database is pretty much
> append only.. with some updating, but next to zero deleting is done...
>
> any comments on this?
>
> thanks
> Scott.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
--
--
by way of pgsql-general(at)commandprompt(dot)com
http://www.postgresql.info/
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Ford | 2001-11-14 07:34:51 | UPDATE w/ subselect doing locking |
| Previous Message | Risko Peter | 2001-11-14 02:17:55 | deferred check help |