From: | "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michał 'Samuel' Modestowicz <samuel(at)netmagia(dot)pl> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TEXT field's length limit in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2001-10-18 13:49:52 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0110180944460.4403-100000@chapelperilous.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, [iso-8859-2] Micha³ 'Samuel' Modestowicz wrote:
> I know that my question may seem trivial, but unfortunately I haven't found
> any understandable info on this topic. It's about length limit of the TEXT
> field in PostgreSQL. I've heard that the TEXT fields in psql are limited to
> 4096 bytes but it's just unbelievable for me. So if I've got text of more
> than 4096 bytes size, for example article - do I really have to put it in
> the LOB field and use these terrific lo-functions to access it ?? Please, if
> anyone can help me - write to samuel(at)netmagia(dot)pl .
The limitation is gone in 7.1. According to the documentation, the length
is unlimited. Realistically, I think sizes of around 1G are the discrete
limit.
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even moderation ought not to be practiced to excess.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-10-18 14:01:02 | Re: Large Files? |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2001-10-18 13:38:11 | Re: Need for protocol description |