Re: encoding names

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: encoding names
Date: 2001-08-22 16:20:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0108221816160.679-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tatsuo Ishii writes:

> I don't think you need to change the function name "getdbencoding".
> "get_canonical_database_encoding" is too long anyway.

But getdbencoding isn't semantically different from the old
getdatabaseencoding. "encoding" isn't the right term anyway, methinks, it
should be "character set". So maybe database_character_set()? (No "get"
please.)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-22 16:25:24 Re: List response time...
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-08-22 16:17:48 Re: GiST patches for 7.2 (please apply)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-08-22 17:08:02 Re: encoding names v2.
Previous Message Liam Stewart 2001-08-22 14:59:38 insert multiple rows attempt two