From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
Date: | 2001-07-20 16:30:36 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107201825440.713-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen writes:
> The RPM additions are:
> 56 contrib-intarray.tar.gz
> 4 file-lists.tar.gz
> 8 migration-scripts.tar.gz
No tar or gz files in CVS.
> 4 postgresql-7.1.plperl.patch
> 4 postgresql-7.1.s390x.patch
No patches in CVS.
> 4 postgresql-bashprofile
Not sure what's in there exactly, so I can't comment.
> 4 postgresql-dump.1.gz
What's wrong with pg_dump?
> 8 postgresql.init
We already have one of those.
> 4 rh-pgdump.sh
See above.
> 8 rpm-pgsql-7.1.patch
See above.
See, if we want to get into the packaging business for real, then there
should not be any patches or extra programs or extra features distributed.
Fixes should be incorporated, not archived.
Then again, there are at least six other packaging efforts out there which
come with yet another set of patches and what not so I see this getting
messy.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-20 16:33:03 | Re: regression test failure on abstime |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-07-20 16:28:33 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-20 16:35:34 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-07-20 16:28:33 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |