| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
| Date: | 2001-07-20 16:35:34 |
| Message-ID: | 3965.995646934@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> The contrib-intarray.tar.gz is a new intarray from Red Hat -- I really need
> to investigate this more closely....
Seems like that should go into our regular contrib tree.
> The .patch files are system-specific and RPM-specific patches that
> probably are not necessary to be applied to the main tree, as they
> mostly involve paths (particularly for the regression tests), with the
> exception of the s390 patch. I can send these patches to the list
> easily enough -- the s390 patch is also a Red Hat contribution.
Portability patches also seem like they should go into the main sources.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-07-20 16:40:31 | Re: Re: Examples of using bytea type |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-20 16:33:03 | Re: regression test failure on abstime |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-07-20 16:51:24 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-07-20 16:30:36 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |