From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.1 docs |
Date: | 2001-03-24 12:48:35 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0103241339310.2319-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> I put in contacts.sgml a *long* time ago, thinking that something like
> it should be in the docs. But it was not complete enough to consider
> including at the time (now that I look, it only has my name ;), so it
> was only a placeholder for the future.
The "Resources" prefix section has contact info. The rest is on the web
site.
> The ref/current_{date,time...}.sgml files are there because (a)
> functions should be documented, and (b) someone documented them. But we
> never documented enough functions to justify setting up an entire
> section of a manual to cover them. I think that these are more likely to
> be used in the future, but we do need additional pages written covering
> other functions.
All functions are documented (for appropriate values of "all") in the
User's Guide, chapter 4. There was probably once the idea of setting up a
reference page set for the functions, but I don't know if this is
particularly better than what we have now. In fact, I would argue it's
worse.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-24 16:32:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 docs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-24 11:01:43 | Re: 7.1 docs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-24 16:12:46 | Re: AW: AW: Re: RELEASE STOPPER? nonportable int64 constant s in pg_crc.c |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-24 12:20:30 | Re: AW: AW: Re: RELEASE STOPPER? nonportable int64 constant s in pg_crc.c |