From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 docs |
Date: | 2001-03-24 16:32:02 |
Message-ID: | 22991.985451522@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> All functions are documented (for appropriate values of "all") in the
> User's Guide, chapter 4. There was probably once the idea of setting up a
> reference page set for the functions, but I don't know if this is
> particularly better than what we have now. In fact, I would argue it's
> worse.
A "page per function" approach is clearly overkill for the vast majority
of our functions. I think that's not unrelated to the fact that no one's
ever bothered to prepare such documentation ;-)
On the other hand, the existing layout of the User's Guide encourages a
"line per function" approach, which is insufficient for at least some
functions. We've worked around that by adding paragraphs below the main
table on each page, but that seems a little awkward in many cases.
A reference section in the style of typical Unix section-3 man pages
(multiple related functions per page, with text discussion and examples)
would be a useful compromise, maybe. Needs more thought.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-03-25 00:48:43 | Re: 7.1 docs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-24 12:48:35 | Re: 7.1 docs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-24 16:49:26 | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2001-03-24 16:28:24 | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |