| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: syslog logging setup broken? |
| Date: | 2001-02-04 21:57:23 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102042249270.864-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > The example startup file is outdated and broken. Don't use it.
>
> Er ... shouldn't we fix it? Or remove it?
See my message on -hackers, "Sparc/Linux patch" thing follow-up.
The bottom line is that, IMHO, writing a portable init.d style (or any
other such concept) startup file that is ready for blind use is beyond
practicality. It might be better to collect a few of the ones that are
being used now (Red Hat-style, SuSE-style, Debian, *BSD-style) and ship
them. This should be coordinated with the packagers, though.
I'll try to look into it.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-04 22:07:40 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-04 20:15:34 | Re: syslog logging setup broken? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-04 22:07:40 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken? |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-02-04 21:49:55 | Re: Like vs '=' bug with indexing |