Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken?
Date: 2001-02-04 22:07:40
Message-ID: 200102042207.RAA15151@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > The example startup file is outdated and broken. Don't use it.
> >
> > Er ... shouldn't we fix it? Or remove it?
>
> See my message on -hackers, "Sparc/Linux patch" thing follow-up.
>
> The bottom line is that, IMHO, writing a portable init.d style (or any
> other such concept) startup file that is ready for blind use is beyond
> practicality. It might be better to collect a few of the ones that are
> being used now (Red Hat-style, SuSE-style, Debian, *BSD-style) and ship
> them. This should be coordinated with the packagers, though.
>

Should I remove init.d from /contrib?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nic Ferrier 2001-02-04 22:37:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: syslog logging setup broken?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-02-04 21:57:23 Re: syslog logging setup broken?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2001-02-04 22:21:01 Re: Message of MOVE
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-02-04 21:57:23 Re: syslog logging setup broken?