Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...
Date: 2001-01-14 11:31:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0101141226480.977-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> I think relational algebra uses the terms relation/attribute and stuff.
> The standards themselves use the more common names table/column. I
> think Date's stuff uses the relational algebra names, and most academic
> papers do perhaps.

It wouldn't be a problem if the terminology were used consistently but
there was a clear tendency that newer and older documentation was getting
out of sync. It looked downright silly in some situations. (CREATE TABLE
creates a table, not a class, right?)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-14 17:30:39 Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-14 05:50:01 Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ...