From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |
Date: | 2001-01-14 17:30:39 |
Message-ID: | 200101141730.MAA28765@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I think relational algebra uses the terms relation/attribute and stuff.
> > The standards themselves use the more common names table/column. I
> > think Date's stuff uses the relational algebra names, and most academic
> > papers do perhaps.
>
> It wouldn't be a problem if the terminology were used consistently but
> there was a clear tendency that newer and older documentation was getting
> out of sync. It looked downright silly in some situations. (CREATE TABLE
> creates a table, not a class, right?)
Did you clean up the manual pages too?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-14 19:17:32 | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-14 11:31:38 | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |