| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha(at)lklug(dot)pdn(dot)ac(dot)lk> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, anuradha(at)gnu(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
| Date: | 2002-10-16 05:40:47 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0210161538240.11360-100000@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:25:23AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> >
> > > ... what I want to know is whether multithreading is likely to get
> > > into in postgresql, say somewhere in 8.x, or even in 9.x?
> >
> > It may be optional some day, most likely for Win32 at first, but we see
> > little value to it on most other platforms; of course, we may be wrong.
>
> In that case, I wonder if it is worth folking a new project to add
> threading support to the backend? Of course, keeping in sync with the
> original would be lot of work.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mtpgsql
> And a minor question is wheter it is legal to keep the _changes_ in such
> a project GPL?
Do you mean 'relicence the forked copy'?
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2002-10-16 05:45:11 | Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-16 05:40:41 | Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c |