From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql and multithreading |
Date: | 2002-10-16 06:30:18 |
Message-ID: | 3DAD54D2.24701.1536B9@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16 Oct 2002 at 15:40, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> > In that case, I wonder if it is worth folking a new project to add
> > threading support to the backend? Of course, keeping in sync with the
> > original would be lot of work.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mtpgsql
Last discussion that happened for multithreading was not to add threads per
connection like mysql, but to split tasks between threads so that IO blocking
and efficiently using SMP abilities would be taken care off IIRC..
One thread per connection isn't going to change much, at least for mainstream
postgresql. For embedded, it might be a necessity..
Bye
Shridhar
--
QOTD: "You're so dumb you don't even have wisdom teeth."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-16 06:39:34 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry? |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-16 06:27:13 | Re: Postgresql and multithreading |