From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I must be blind... |
Date: | 2002-06-14 22:09:49 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0206142309040.4131-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > I don't think you can use PERFORM like that. Try:
>
> Actually I believe he can; after looking at the manual I realized that
> the problem is that PERFORM is syntactically a substitute for SELECT.
> In other words he needed to write
>
> PERFORM 1 FROM orders ...
> not
> PERFORM SELECT 1 FROM orders ...
Thanks Tom,
I didn't get that from the manual at all. I think I should go reread it.
--
Nigel J. Andrews
Director
---
Logictree Systems Limited
Computer Consultants
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Carter | 2002-06-14 22:19:10 | Re: large database on postgres |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-14 21:35:58 | Re: I must be blind... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2002-06-14 22:18:24 | Re: Reduce heap tuple header size |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2002-06-14 21:45:39 | Re: FEATURE REQUEST - More dynamic date type? |