| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: I must be blind... |
| Date: | 2002-06-14 21:35:58 |
| Message-ID: | 9224.1024090558@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I don't think you can use PERFORM like that. Try:
Actually I believe he can; after looking at the manual I realized that
the problem is that PERFORM is syntactically a substitute for SELECT.
In other words he needed to write
PERFORM 1 FROM orders ...
not
PERFORM SELECT 1 FROM orders ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-06-14 22:09:49 | Re: I must be blind... |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2002-06-14 21:35:44 | Re: large database on postgres |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2002-06-14 21:45:39 | Re: FEATURE REQUEST - More dynamic date type? |
| Previous Message | Bill Cunningham | 2002-06-14 20:41:07 | Re: Big Test Environment Feature |