Re: Functions in Postgres

From: Gordon Clarke <gordonc(at)adf-serials(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Functions in Postgres
Date: 2002-04-11 20:59:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0204120656530.30360-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Each language handler is free to interpret the source text in its own way.
> This has nothing to do with trustedness (is SQL not trusted?). Neither
> PL/pgSQL nor PL/Tcl involve a compilation step, although PL/pgSQL does
> some optimizations internally that could be called compilation.
>
> Is this question just out of random interest, or are you really asking
> something like are functions fast?

I was asking to see if there was any speed penalty with coding a fn in SQL
as opposed to PL/pgsql. It appears that there is and from what you've said
PL/pgsql is slightly faster than PL/TCL and probably PL/Perl. Am I correct
in drawing that conclusion?

Thanks for your help.

--
Cheers...Gordon
-------------+------------------------------------------------------------
ADF Aircraft | Cataloguing the serial numbers of Australian Defence Force
Serial | aircraft for all the three series.
Numbers | http://www.adf-serials.com
-------------+------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Carpenter 2002-04-11 22:16:37 Inserting values into numeric fields
Previous Message Richard Ellerbrock 2002-04-11 15:48:02 Re: REPOST: Trouble with SQL conversion