Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output
Date: 2002-03-11 05:36:36
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0203111635430.27056-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > I agree. This is fine under Unix, but command arguments are not really a
> > grammar. Yacc doesn't enjoy terminal repetition and for good reason: it
> > usually suggests a clumsy grammar.
> >
> > Personally, I think that Tom's code should go into standard EXPLAIN.
>
> I am confused. Which grammar do you like?

Neither =).

> > Is this overkill?
>
> That was my initial reaction. :-)

Fair enough.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2002-03-11 05:55:45 Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-11 05:36:12 Re: Autoconf upgrade