Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output
Date: 2002-03-11 05:34:01
Message-ID: 200203110534.g2B5Y1228483@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > I agree. This is fine under Unix, but command arguments are not really a
> > > grammar. Yacc doesn't enjoy terminal repetition and for good reason: it
> > > usually suggests a clumsy grammar.
> > >
> > > Personally, I think that Tom's code should go into standard EXPLAIN.
> >
> > I am confused. Which grammar do you like?
>
> Neither =).

OK, would you suggest one?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-11 05:36:12 Re: Autoconf upgrade
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-11 05:30:29 Re: Autoconf upgrade