From: | Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no> |
Cc: | PGSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: JDBC Performance |
Date: | 2000-10-21 16:47:41 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0010211746570.1607-100000@maidast.demon.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
On 18 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>
>
> > > couldn't produce a full patch using cvs diff -c this time since I have
> > > created new files and anonymous cvs usage doesn't allow you to
> > > adds. I'm supplying the modified src/interfaces/jdbc as a tarball at :
> > > http://www.candleweb.no/~gunnar/projects/pgsql/postgres-jdbc-2000-10-05.tgz
> >
> > Got it. Don't worry about the diff, I'll merge it in manually. At this
> > stage, it will be easier, and less prone to generating bugs with the
> > changes I've got here.
>
> Hmm. I just grabbed the latest source from CVS and it seems to be that my
> first version and not the latest one who is merged in(or maybe it was Bruce
> who did that...). Anyway the version in CVS is buggy and should be replaced
> with the version from October 5 pointed to in the mail quoted above. The
> current changes in CVS needs to be backed out one way or the other.
Hmmm, I'll check it here, as I thought I had the October 5th one in.
> If you need any help, I can create a new version based on the
> current CVS image.
It shouldn't be that difficult. I'll let you know if there's a problem.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-22 02:58:09 | Re: Out of memory errors with mod_perl |
Previous Message | John McKown | 2000-10-21 13:41:29 | Just to say thanks. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pgsql-bugs | 2000-11-14 06:58:56 | no way in LargeObject API to detect short read? |
Previous Message | Gunnar R|nning | 2000-10-18 13:37:56 | Re: Re: JDBC Performance |