Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris
Date: 2000-07-02 15:22:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0007021717440.351-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers(at)thewrittenword(dot)com writes:

> 3. Why is NAN defined in src/include/solaris_i386.h as:
> #define NAN (*(__const double *) __nan)
> #endif /* GCC. */
> if the compiler is not GCC? The Solaris C compiler does not like this.
> I removed it and the compilation succeeded.

We never cleared out this item. What is the proper way to generate a `NaN'
on your compiler? Does `0.0/0.0' work?

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-02 16:47:55 Re: vacuumdb problem
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-07-02 15:22:43 Re: Big 7.1 open items