From: | pgsql-hackers(at)thewrittenword(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris |
Date: | 2000-07-04 17:26:34 |
Message-ID: | 200007041728.MAA29313@postal.thewrittenword.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 05:22:53PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> pgsql-hackers(at)thewrittenword(dot)com writes:
>
> > 3. Why is NAN defined in src/include/solaris_i386.h as:
> > #define NAN (*(__const double *) __nan)
> > #endif /* GCC. */
> > if the compiler is not GCC? The Solaris C compiler does not like this.
> > I removed it and the compilation succeeded.
>
> We never cleared out this item. What is the proper way to generate a `NaN'
> on your compiler? Does `0.0/0.0' work?
I tried the following:
#include <ieeefp.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int
main (void) {
float f = 0.0/0.0;
if (isnanf (f)) {
puts ("nan");
}
}
and the output was "nan".
--
albert chin (china(at)thewrittenword(dot)com)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karel Zak | 2000-07-04 17:26:43 | Re: Statistical aggregates |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-04 16:59:17 | Re: Statistical aggregates |