Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??';

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??';
Date: 2000-05-09 20:51:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0005091500450.387-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Rather than the separate pw files, maybe pg_shadow needs some kind of
> provision for database-specific passwords ...

Perhaps the issue is not so much having different passwords for each
database. I don't think this is necessarily a priority. (I think it would
be rather confusing that there would be one user and many passwords.)

The issue is that you can't say "Do password authentication, but only for
these users". It forces you to make separate password files. Perhaps we
could extend the syntax similar to this

| host all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 passwd &user1,user2,user3

to mean "do password authentication using the pg_shadow passwords, but
only for the named users". (`&' would be some special character to
distinguish a list of users from a password file name.)

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-05-09 20:51:27 Re: CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER '??';
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-05-09 20:50:59 Re: Re: Ready to release?