Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Martin Neumann <lists(at)mne(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes
Date: 2000-01-20 21:55:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0001202224160.349-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

The standard doesn't provide for specifically unsigned types, so I do not
believe anyone would want to go through that trouble. Sorry.

On 2000-01-19, Martin Neumann mentioned:

> Are there any plans to implement unsigned datatypes like uint4 and
> uint8?
>
> In many cases I don't need the signed int4 numbers, but I would be happy
> to have a larger range without using the twice as large int8 type.
>
>

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-20 21:55:11 Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names
Previous Message clyde jones 2000-01-20 21:29:31 how to for postgres as website backend