Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Martin Neumann <lists(at)mne(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes
Date: 2000-01-20 22:18:36
Message-ID: 200001202218.RAA23082@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> The standard doesn't provide for specifically unsigned types, so I do not
> believe anyone would want to go through that trouble. Sorry.

Actually, oid data type is an unsigned int4. If it does not behave that
way, it is a bug.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Mercer 2000-01-20 22:40:44 Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-20 22:04:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names