From: | Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2000-02-03 16:50:30 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.10002031049570.6100-100000@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maintaining an accurate count of descendants (or indexes for that
> matter) would be expensive; in particular, it'd create severe
> concurrency problems.
What about fixing these things on VACUUM then?
Taral
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-03 16:52:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-03 16:26:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-02-03 16:51:33 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-02-03 16:43:51 | Parser/planner and column aliases |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-02-03 16:51:33 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-03 16:43:43 | Re: [SQL] INSTALL doc correction ... |