Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

From: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-02-03 16:50:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.10002031049570.6100-100000@r149127-2815.dobiecenter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Maintaining an accurate count of descendants (or indexes for that
> matter) would be expensive; in particular, it'd create severe
> concurrency problems.

What about fixing these things on VACUUM then?

Taral

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-03 16:52:58 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-03 16:26:50 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-02-03 16:51:33 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-02-03 16:43:51 Parser/planner and column aliases

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-02-03 16:51:33 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-03 16:43:43 Re: [SQL] INSTALL doc correction ...