From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net> |
Cc: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2000-02-03 17:32:39 |
Message-ID: | 28437.949599159@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maintaining an accurate count of descendants (or indexes for that
>> matter) would be expensive; in particular, it'd create severe
>> concurrency problems.
> What about fixing these things on VACUUM then?
Could probably do that ... not sure if it's worth the trouble ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bertrand Bourdon | 2000-02-03 17:32:55 | |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-03 16:52:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Hollomon | 2000-02-03 17:47:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-03 17:30:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Parser/planner and column aliases |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-03 17:46:29 | Re: [SQL] Question about SELECT and ORDER BY |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-03 16:52:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |