Re: Proposal for async support in libpq

From: Jan Vicherek <honza(at)ied(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
Date: 1998-04-21 04:59:55
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980421005858.3665U-100000@ann.ied.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > You supply the indication to the backend, and I will see that the
> > backend processes it properly.
>
> You're on ;-)
>
> Signaling the cancel request via OOB sounds reasonable, as long as
> nothing else is using it and all the systems we care about support it.

SSH doesn't have OOB. You can't send an OOB via SSH encrypted channel.

Jan

-- Gospel of Jesus is the saving power of God for all who believe --
Jan Vicherek ## To some, nothing is impossible. ## www.ied.com/~honza
>>> Free Software Union President ... www.fslu.org <<<
Interactive Electronic Design Inc. -#- PGP: finger honza(at)ied(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-04-21 05:42:39 Re: [HACKERS] shift/reduce problem with ecpg
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-04-21 04:23:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Configuration problems in PostgreSQL 6.3.2 on Linux-ELF