Re: Proposal for async support in libpq

>
> On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > You supply the indication to the backend, and I will see that the
> > > backend processes it properly.
> >
> > You're on ;-)
> >
> > Signaling the cancel request via OOB sounds reasonable, as long as
> > nothing else is using it and all the systems we care about support it.
>
> SSH doesn't have OOB. You can't send an OOB via SSH encrypted channel.

I have trouble buying that. SSH is just the socket filter. Perhaps the
OOB data is not encrypted like the normal data?

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)