From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: fate of CLUSTER command ? |
Date: | 2002-08-04 07:21:39 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.4.44.0208041006500.15807-100000@ra.sai.msu.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > I just tried CLUSTER command at fts.postgresql.org to cluster
> > fts index and got very visual performance win. Unfortunately
> > I had to restore permissions and recreate other indices by hand.
> > So, I'm interested what's a future of CLUSTER command ?
>
> Yes, I have always liked CLUSTER with full text searches because you are
> usually hitting multiple rows with a single equaltiy restriction, and
> CLUSTER puts all the hits on the same page.
>
> If you look in contrib/fulltextindex, you will see mention of CLUSTER in
> the README. It may make sense to add that to your documentation.
>
I have to play to get feeling. I don't understand what happens if
rows will be added to clustered table. Also, what will happens if
there are several other indices on the same table ? Does clustering
on one index will decrease performance of queries based on another
indices ?
> Also, is there any value to contrib/fulltextindex now that we have
> contrib/tsearch?
>
they 're different things.
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-08-04 07:42:06 | Re: Set 'o patches |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-04 07:18:23 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |