| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fate of CLUSTER command ? |
| Date: | 2002-08-04 00:57:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200208040057.g740vhB14596@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> I just tried CLUSTER command at fts.postgresql.org to cluster
> fts index and got very visual performance win. Unfortunately
> I had to restore permissions and recreate other indices by hand.
> So, I'm interested what's a future of CLUSTER command ?
Yes, I have always liked CLUSTER with full text searches because you are
usually hitting multiple rows with a single equaltiy restriction, and
CLUSTER puts all the hits on the same page.
If you look in contrib/fulltextindex, you will see mention of CLUSTER in
the README. It may make sense to add that to your documentation.
Also, is there any value to contrib/fulltextindex now that we have
contrib/tsearch?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-04 01:02:57 | Re: fate of CLUSTER command ? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-04 00:40:05 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |