Re: JDBC

From: Travis Bauer <trbauer(at)cs(dot)indiana(dot)edu>
To: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: algobit(at)algobit(dot)com, ML-Postrges-general <Pgsql-General(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC
Date: 2000-09-05 14:22:11
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.21.0009050917410.23039-100000@ghost.cs.indiana.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


That's not true. Look at the cvs log for
src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java

There are entries for June 7 and June 9. These are changes I made to
ResultSet.java to make it more JDBC2 compliant. These changes are not
in the 7.0.2 release, and the functions I mentioned in the
previous posting do not work properly in the current release.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
----------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Peter Mount wrote:

> Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current> The compiled form has been available online for at least 3 years now.
>
> Peter

In response to

  • Re: JDBC at 2000-09-05 11:42:32 from Peter Mount

Responses

  • Re: JDBC at 2000-09-05 14:34:29 from Peter Mount

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-09-05 14:34:29 Re: JDBC
Previous Message Alan 2000-09-05 12:07:43 pq_recvbuf: unexpected EOF on client connection