Re: JDBC

Ah, just checked. Bruce applied those changes.

I'm thinking we may have the same problem I had with 6.5.3, the changes were
in cvs, but didn't get out to the release. Marc, any ideas?

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk, me(at)petermount(dot)com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Travis Bauer" <trbauer(at)cs(dot)indiana(dot)edu>
To: "Peter Mount" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: <algobit(at)algobit(dot)com>; "ML-Postrges-general"
<Pgsql-General(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] JDBC

>
> That's not true. Look at the cvs log for
> src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java
>
> There are entries for June 7 and June 9. These are changes I made to
> ResultSet.java to make it more JDBC2 compliant. These changes are not
> in the 7.0.2 release, and the functions I mentioned in the
> previous posting do not work properly in the current release.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Peter Mount wrote:
>
> > Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on
www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current> The compiled form has been
available online for at least 3 years now.
> >
> > Peter
>