Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server

From: <mkscott(at)sacadia(dot)com>
To: Haroldo Stenger <hstenger(at)adinet(dot)com(dot)uy>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date: 2002-02-06 22:59:14
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.10.10202061456510.2321-100000@goldengate.kojoworldwide.com.
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Haroldo Stenger wrote:

>
> By the way, my original question about how integrated the multi-threading fork
> reached, remained unanswered. I will assume it went threading, dropping forever
> the original behaviour, so deciding me towards not considering threading a
> viable option (for now).

Yes, you can use postmaster and fork for a connection...or at least you
could prior to some recent changes. I haven't tested it that way for
awhile but it should work.

Myron
mkscott(at)sacadia(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haroldo Stenger 2002-02-06 23:39:37 Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Previous Message Haroldo Stenger 2002-02-06 22:31:34 Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server