Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server

"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> The thing is, there are several areas where using threads would be a
> benefit, from what I've read on this list over the years ... as time goes
> on, less and less of the OSs in use dont' have threads, so we have to
> start *somewhere* to work towards that sort of hybrid system ...

Yes.

But, maybe things like full-fledged replication, savepoints/nested transactions,
out-of-transaction-scope cursors, and others must have priority over this; and
that mutating PG thread safe, will slow down a 7.3 release a lot, something not
wanted by many here.

Let's make a pro cons list of thread related aspectcs here. We saw a lot of
cons. Write some pros explicitely. We're not in a hurry anyway.

Regards,
Haroldo,