Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again

On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> > What I'm in doubt about is, why (if) we don't want to install
> > mcxt.h? It is required (since my changes) by every user
> > built backend-loadable module. So it should be installed.
>
> If it's only mcxt.h that is newly required, we may as well just export
> it and be done with it. My recollection of the original report was
> that *several* formerly backend-private headers needed to be added to
> the export set, and I thought that wasn't a very good idea...
>

It's been a while since I switched to CVS but I remember other .h
dependencies with each .h file I added starting with palloc.h. I ended up
getting tired of it and just copied the contents of the include dir over
rather than fight with it. So unless somethings changed there are more
headers needed that palloc.h and mcxt.h Sorry I don't have better
details as to which ones it needed. I'll be doing a fresh install this
weekend, if it'd help I'll make a list.

->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->---<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<
James Thompson 138 Cardwell Hall Manhattan, Ks 66506 785-532-0561
Kansas State University Department of Mathematics
->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->---<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<