Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again
Date: 1999-03-03 23:31:52
Message-ID: 26721.920503912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> What I'm in doubt about is, why (if) we don't want to install
> mcxt.h? It is required (since my changes) by every user
> built backend-loadable module. So it should be installed.

If it's only mcxt.h that is newly required, we may as well just export
it and be done with it. My recollection of the original report was
that *several* formerly backend-private headers needed to be added to
the export set, and I thought that wasn't a very good idea...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-03-03 23:44:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c'
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-03-03 22:24:26 Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3