From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Date: | 2008-10-28 21:23:57 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0810281721500.6833@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Kris Jurka napsal(a):
>>
>> Here's a patch that changes everything over to the the new API and
>> implements the old API by calling the new API.
>
> It seems to me OK. I have only one comment. I prefer to pfree allocated
> memory for temporary nulls array. I think that caller could call old API
> many times without memory context cleanup.
>
Here's an incremental patch to add the suggested pfreeing.
Kris Jurka
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pfree-bool-arrays-for-htup-api.patch | text/plain | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-10-28 21:25:40 | Re: PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28 |
Previous Message | Martin Pihlak | 2008-10-28 21:12:17 | Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements |