From: | books at ejurka(dot)com (Kris Jurka) |
---|---|
To: | |
Subject: | [Pljava-dev] Working on 1.4 beta release |
Date: | 2007-11-20 16:46:18 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0711201126080.1449@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Perhaps an idea would be to provide binary support for the latest, or
> the latest two? I.e. if you want older, build your own?
>
In general this is reasonable, but at the moment I think we need to
support 8.1 because it's whats installed/supported on many linux
distros.
>> Build java code with -g, but pljava c code without debugging symbols I
>> reckon. If someone wants to debug pljava C code, they can build it
>> themselves. :)
>>
>>
> Well, it's not so much about debugging really. It's more the information
> you can get once something is crashing. As I mentioned, the JVM prints a
> stack trace that can be very useful. Much is gained if the user who
> experiences a crash can provide the JVM dump file in a bug-report or
> attach it to a mailing list posting.
Just to clarify, the java code is never built with -g (see
src/java/Makefile.global). Is there any reason not to change this to
always build with -g?
>> I have some free time over the next few weeks, so I can have a go at
>> getting the wiki docs into some kind of source control.
> Awesome.
Yes, that'd be great. From there it's easy to publish this to
http://pljava.projects.postgresql.org.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2007-11-20 16:56:04 | [Pljava-dev] commit + bug emails |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2007-11-20 16:09:46 | [Pljava-dev] Working on 1.4 beta release |