Re: Training events policy ... first test case

On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Dave Page wrote:

>> ------- Original Message -------
>> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
>> To: Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
>> Sent: 04/11/07, 17:39:21
>> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Training events policy ... first test case
>>
>> However I do see a flood of entries later from Certfirst. Not to be an
>> ass, but this problem goes away for the forseeable future if we just
>> ban Certfirst from posting training events. There is no way they are
>> running all those classes.
>
> Any talk along those lines should not be held in this public forum.
>

I don't see why not. This whole thread has been full of vague, "some
companies" are doing bad things. If there are bad apples out there, let's
expose them. While it may not be appropriate to speak for the community
yet, I don't see why individuals naming names is a bad thing. It focuses
the actual discussion back to reality and let's people in the know have
some useful information when discussing or considering training.

Your suggestion implies that instead of doing this publicly a www team
cabal should decide this in some back room and not inform anyone of it.

Kris Jurka