Re: Training events policy ... first test case

> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
> To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: 04/11/07, 19:28:54
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Training events policy ... first test case
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Dave Page wrote:
>
> >> ------- Original Message -------
> >> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> >> To: Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
> >> Sent: 04/11/07, 17:39:21
> >> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Training events policy ... first test case
> >>
> >> However I do see a flood of entries later from Certfirst. Not to be an
> >> ass, but this problem goes away for the forseeable future if we just
> >> ban Certfirst from posting training events. There is no way they are
> >> running all those classes.
> >
> > Any talk along those lines should not be held in this public forum.
> >
>
> I don't see why not. This whole thread has been full of vague, "some
> companies" are doing bad things. If there are bad apples out there, let's
> expose them. While it may not be appropriate to speak for the community
> yet, I don't see why individuals naming names is a bad thing. It focuses
> the actual discussion back to reality and let's people in the know have
> some useful information when discussing or considering training.
>
> Your suggestion implies that instead of doing this publicly a www team
> cabal should decide this in some back room and not inform anyone of it.
>

You have some proof they're doing anything inappropriate? Confident a judge would accept it if they sued for damage to their reputation and loss of potential business by allegations made in a public forum?

Regards, Dave