| From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Siegmar <o(dot)siegmar(at)vitrado(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with infinity |
| Date: | 2005-01-25 08:35:52 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.56.0501250333160.27017@leary.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> > Well, no one seems to have any better ideas, how about a better place for
> > the infinity constants. org.postgresql.jdbc2.TimestampUtils is not a
> > public interface. PGStatement?
>
> I vote for PGStatement :-)
>
I was getting ready to apply this patch when I decided to add a couple
more tests and I'm getting a failure for getDate() that I do not have time
at the momemnt to investigate. Could you take a look at the attached
patch and see what's going on.
Kris Jurka
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| infinity_date_failure.patch | text/plain | 23.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-01-25 08:54:13 | Re: Versioned vs unversioned jarfile names? |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-01-25 07:27:17 | Re: Patch to implement Connection.nativeSQL |