| From: | Oliver Siegmar <o(dot)siegmar(at)vitrado(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with infinity |
| Date: | 2005-02-04 10:11:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200502041111.22381.o.siegmar@vitrado.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 09:35, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> > > Well, no one seems to have any better ideas, how about a better place
> > > for the infinity constants. org.postgresql.jdbc2.TimestampUtils is not
> > > a public interface. PGStatement?
> >
> > I vote for PGStatement :-)
>
> I was getting ready to apply this patch when I decided to add a couple
> more tests and I'm getting a failure for getDate() that I do not have time
> at the momemnt to investigate. Could you take a look at the attached
> patch and see what's going on.
Attached is a new patch (diffed against current CVS) which fullfills the
"requirements" of all junit tests.
I've tested timezones 'Europe/Berlin' and 'America/Los_Angeles'.
Anyway I'm not 100% sure if this is a good way handling this.
Oliver
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pgjdbc_infinity5.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 2.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Schaber | 2005-02-04 10:42:41 | Re: context classloader |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-02-04 09:54:16 | Re: BUG #1459: Connection hangs when other connection is not committed |