Re: (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability

Tom already merged [latest version of this patch] it in, so you can delete
this one from patch list.

Thanks
-alex

On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> > Augh. Previous patch had some garbage changes in it. Sorry. This one is
> > clean...I promise, I'll get better at this.
> >
> > -alex
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> >
> > > This is second take at indexability of << operator for inet types.
> > >
> > > Please take a look at it.
> > >
> > > Also, I have a question: I put in a regression test to check that the type
> > > can be indexed, by doing 'explain select ...'. However, the expected
> > > result may vary when the optimizer is tweaked.
> > >
> > > I am not sure if its a good idea to check for that, so feel free to not
> > > commit the regression test part of this patch...If there's a better way to
> > > check that the query will use the index in regression test, I'd like to
> > > know too.
> > >
> > > -alex
> > >
>
> Content-Description:
>
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>