Re: (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability

> Tom already merged [latest version of this patch] it in, so you can delete
> this one from patch list.

Oh, OK. I thought he had done that but I couldn't find the commit
message in my mailbox.

>
> Thanks
> -alex
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> >
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> >
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> >
> > > Augh. Previous patch had some garbage changes in it. Sorry. This one is
> > > clean...I promise, I'll get better at this.
> > >
> > > -alex
> > >
> > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is second take at indexability of << operator for inet types.
> > > >
> > > > Please take a look at it.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I have a question: I put in a regression test to check that the type
> > > > can be indexed, by doing 'explain select ...'. However, the expected
> > > > result may vary when the optimizer is tweaked.
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure if its a good idea to check for that, so feel free to not
> > > > commit the regression test part of this patch...If there's a better way to
> > > > check that the query will use the index in regression test, I'd like to
> > > > know too.
> > > >
> > > > -alex
> > > >
> >
> > Content-Description:
> >
> > [ Attachment, skipping... ]
> >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >
> >
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026