Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! )

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! )
Date: 2001-01-12 16:57:29
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.31.0101121256410.21628-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > Namely, should we bundle up a beta4 this weeekend, so that the GiST
> > changes are in place for further testing, or hold off for ... ?
>
> First I'd like to finish a couple of open items I have, like fixing
> the CRIT_SECTION code so that SIGTERM response will not occur when
> we are holding a spinlock. Should be able to get this stuff done in
> a day or two, if I quit arguing about GIST and get back to work...

Okay, let's scheduale for Monday then if we can ... unless someone comes
across something major like we did with the whole beta2/beta3 release :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Joerdens 2001-01-12 17:05:09 Beta2 Vacuum and pg_dump failures and mangled databases
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-01-12 16:55:06 Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!