| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! |
| Date: | 2001-01-12 16:55:06 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.31.0101121253590.21628-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > How about adding an optional test a la "bigtest" for GiST for this
> > release?
>
> We could do that, but it seems like rather pointless effort, compared
> to just telling people "go run the tests in these contrib modules if
> you want to test GIST".
>
> I have no objection to fully integrating some GIST test(s) for 7.2.
> I just don't want to deal with it at this late stage of the 7.1 cycle.
> We have a long list of considerably more mainstream to-do items yet
> to deal with ...
Not up to us to deal with, its up to Oleg ...
Oleg, if you could work on and submit patches for this before the release,
that would be appreciated ... it might also serve to increase visibility
of GiST if ppl know there is a regress test for it ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-01-12 16:57:29 | Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! ) |
| Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-01-12 16:54:42 | Re: Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN. |