From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Date: | 2000-12-30 01:39:51 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.31.0012292139340.50868-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> [001229 17:06] wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > > > My understanding (from the recent discussion) is that Postgresql
> > > > has certain dependancies on libreadline and won't compile/work
> > > > without it,
> > >
> > > Then you're working from a misconception.
> >
> > I think the misconception that he might be working on here is the point
> > someone brought up that when configure runs, it is adding -lreadline to
> > the backend compile, even though that I don't think there is any reason
> > for doing such?
>
> I thought psql required libreadline, I'm not sure who said it.
Purely optional feature(s) .. if readline isn't found, they aren't enabled
...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-12-30 01:41:18 | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Previous Message | Adam Haberlach | 2000-12-30 01:37:41 | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |